Paper

Proving and Improving the Platonic Representation Hypothesis with JEPAs

Good-view JEPAs use paired observations of one scene, not token continuation, so separately trained encoders align up to one rotation.

arXiv ↗Oct 29, 2026Code ↗

  • llm
  • cv
  • multimodal
  • self-supervised learning
  • representation learning
  • cross-modal alignment
Combines method diagram with scaling curve showing core alignment claim vs baselines
Combines method diagram with scaling curve showing core alignment claim vs baselines

What it is

Proves that separately trained JEPAs align across modalities up to a rotation when positives are matched scene views, and shows this is far more efficient than next-token prediction. Instead of relying on scale to make language align with vision, use JEPA positives that are two views of the same scene; this yields a theorem that separately trained modality encoders share one representation up to rotation, while next-token prediction is framed as a bad-view JEPA.

Key results

  • 109M text JEPA gets .184 vs Qwen2.5-72B .154 on DINOv2 alignment
  • Matches next-token prediction with 21.6M vs 900M samples, 42x fewer
  • Pair-free alignment hits 64% top-5 on ImageNet-100 vs prior LM best 56%

Cross-modal platonic representations depend mainly on the positive-view structure, not on scaling next-token prediction alone.

One useful ML email a week.

Worth your time, not all of your time.

We track new ML work across papers, code, and data, then keep only the pieces worth a closer look. Selected, not collected.

Papers.Data.Code

The Weekly ML Signal

Selected, not collected.

One useful ML email a week: the papers, repos and datasets worth your attention.

Worth your time, not all of your time.